1) Harry suggested that the $1 admin fee be absorbed by NN since it grows linearly with their revenues. But when asked why he did not mention the lowering of the minimum withdrawal limit and whether that would cause a “non-linear” bump, he avoided the argument.
Sir, when in the morning did I suggest the $1 is admin fee and should be absorb by Nuffnang? Those who read the morning’s exchange would know I meant the $1 is part of overhead. Never did I mention $1 is an admin fee.
2) He continued accusing me of being biased when I pointed out both the pros and cons, whereas, he only posted or linked to all the bad press. This prompted Rachel to question why he was so bent on a smear campaign about Nuffnang, of which he didn’t answer …naturally.
For those who read my reply in the morning, would know I haven’t use the word biased to anybody in the morning, now we know Mr Larry Lim has a perception problem.
3) When told that he should be open-minded and meet Ming directly if he has doubts, he chose to remain anonymous instead and to continue blogging based on assumptions - something I was accused of in the first place. This is like a casino where the banker decides the rules huh?
When told he should assume the situation based on the mood of the community, he got very frustrated and suddenly threatened to delete all my comments and refuse my comments to be posted.
Who is this mystery person anyway? Why does he spend so much effort in victimizing others? Why does he chooses to censor the good press and only put up negative ones? Why is he hiding in anonymity? What else is he hiding?
Sir, I do not victimize. My job is to disclose negative ones like yours is to disclose positive. We have different role. Lets respect each other’s role. Let the points be made avail and let the reasoning prevail.
Judging from your reply to several other bloggers such as Paddy Tan and Cobalt, we can tell your mind ain’t condense enough to carry it through.
Have a nice day Larry, and to say I delete my own posting on your blog where we know postings can only be deleted by you is at best a idiocy.
*Larry went on to delete all my comments, create an entry(disable comment on this entry) and accuse me of deleting my own postings from his personal blog. How smart is this man? Ladies and gentleman, your judgement.
Larry : If you are not able to engage replies, don't bother starting a thread. It just makes you look bad.
Read more!
Sir, when in the morning did I suggest the $1 is admin fee and should be absorb by Nuffnang? Those who read the morning’s exchange would know I meant the $1 is part of overhead. Never did I mention $1 is an admin fee.
2) He continued accusing me of being biased when I pointed out both the pros and cons, whereas, he only posted or linked to all the bad press. This prompted Rachel to question why he was so bent on a smear campaign about Nuffnang, of which he didn’t answer …naturally.
For those who read my reply in the morning, would know I haven’t use the word biased to anybody in the morning, now we know Mr Larry Lim has a perception problem.
3) When told that he should be open-minded and meet Ming directly if he has doubts, he chose to remain anonymous instead and to continue blogging based on assumptions - something I was accused of in the first place. This is like a casino where the banker decides the rules huh?
When told he should assume the situation based on the mood of the community, he got very frustrated and suddenly threatened to delete all my comments and refuse my comments to be posted.
Who is this mystery person anyway? Why does he spend so much effort in victimizing others? Why does he chooses to censor the good press and only put up negative ones? Why is he hiding in anonymity? What else is he hiding?
Sir, I do not victimize. My job is to disclose negative ones like yours is to disclose positive. We have different role. Lets respect each other’s role. Let the points be made avail and let the reasoning prevail.
Judging from your reply to several other bloggers such as Paddy Tan and Cobalt, we can tell your mind ain’t condense enough to carry it through.
Have a nice day Larry, and to say I delete my own posting on your blog where we know postings can only be deleted by you is at best a idiocy.
*Larry went on to delete all my comments, create an entry(disable comment on this entry) and accuse me of deleting my own postings from his personal blog. How smart is this man? Ladies and gentleman, your judgement.
Larry : If you are not able to engage replies, don't bother starting a thread. It just makes you look bad.
